England's Pavement Parking Ban

What Changes, When, and What It Means.


INTRODUCTION:

If you have ever had to step into the road because a car is parked across the pavement — pushing a buggy, using a wheelchair, guiding a visually impaired person, or simply trying to walk down the street — you will know exactly why this topic generates such strong feelings.

Pavement parking has been illegal in London since 1974. Scotland brought in a nationwide ban in 2019. Wales has been consulting on similar measures. England, by contrast, has long operated under a patchwork of local bylaws and police enforcement powers that, in practice, have done very little to tackle the problem.

That is now changing. The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act, which received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026, grants local councils across England new powers to restrict and enforce against pavement parking — without the slow, street-by-street Traffic Regulation Order process that previously made enforcement so difficult. Fines of between £60 and £130 are expected, broadly mirroring the penalty system already operating in London.

This is one of the most significant changes to everyday parking enforcement in England in decades, and it has implications not just for drivers but for developers, planners, and local authorities managing parking in and around new developments.

This post explains what has changed, what the new rules actually say, when enforcement is likely to begin, and what the wider planning implications are.

Why has it taken so long?

England's pavement parking problem has been debated by government for well over a decade. A government consultation in 2020 received more than 15,000 responses, with 81% of individuals and 96% of organisations identifying pavement parking as a problem in their area. Support for a ban has consistently been strong — a 2025 RAC survey of over 1,700 drivers found that 83% favoured new rules, provided sensible exemptions were made for genuinely narrow streets.

The obstacle has never been political will or public opinion. It has been the mechanics of the legal system. Under the previous framework, the only people who could issue fines for pavement parking were the police — and only in situations involving dangerous obstruction. Council civil enforcement officers, who handle the majority of day-to-day parking enforcement across England, had no legal power to issue penalties for pavement parking at all. They could only enforce against breaches of on-road rules such as double yellow lines.

Changing that required primary legislation — an Act of Parliament — because it meant extending the powers of local authority civil enforcement officers in a way that only Parliament can authorise. That legislation has now been passed.

What the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act actually says

The Act — which covers a wide range of devolution and local government matters, not just parking — includes specific provisions granting local authorities in England new powers in relation to pavement parking.

The approach adopted is not a nationwide ban on pavement parking in the way that Scotland has implemented. Instead, the legislation gives councils the power to prohibit pavement parking on specific streets or across wider areas, and to enforce against what is defined as unnecessary obstruction of the pavement.

This is an important distinction. The law does not automatically make pavement parking illegal on every street in England. What it does is give councils a much simpler mechanism to restrict and enforce against it in the areas they identify as problematic — without needing to go through a separate Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) process for each individual street.

A Traffic Regulation Order is the legal instrument local authorities normally use to impose parking controls on a specific road. The TRO process involves public consultation, advertising, and a statutory waiting period — it is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The new legislation bypasses much of this complexity for pavement parking restrictions, meaning councils can act much more quickly than before.

However, the new enforcement powers are not yet in force. Further secondary legislation — statutory instruments made by ministers — is still required before councils can actually begin issuing fines under the new framework. The government has indicated it wants to move quickly, and late 2026 is widely referenced as the target for the secondary legislation to be in place.

What fines can drivers expect? 

The expected fine range of £60 to £130 mirrors the penalty charge notice system already operating in London for pavement parking offences.

In London, a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for pavement parking is currently set at £130 in inner London boroughs and £60 in outer London boroughs, with a 50% discount available if the fine is paid within 14 days. It is expected that a similar structure will apply in England once the new powers are in force, with local authorities having some discretion over the exact level within a permitted range.

In Scotland, where the nationwide ban has been operating since local councils began enforcing it from 2021 onwards, PCNs are set at £100, reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days.

Civil enforcement — meaning enforcement by council officers rather than the police — is the model that has operated for most standard parking offences in England for many years and is well understood by local authorities. The extension of this model to pavement parking is essentially closing a long-standing gap in the enforcement framework.

Which streets will be affected? 

This is where the English approach differs from the Scottish model, and where there is still some uncertainty.

In Scotland, the law created a nationwide default prohibition on pavement parking, double parking, and parking across dropped kerbs. Councils can grant exemptions for specific streets where pavement parking is genuinely unavoidable — typically in areas with very narrow roads where removing pavement parking would make the street impassable for through traffic.

In England, the approach appears to be the reverse: councils will need to actively designate the streets or areas where pavement parking restrictions apply, rather than starting from a position of nationwide prohibition. This gives local authorities more flexibility but also means that the coverage and consistency of enforcement will initially vary significantly from one area to the next.

The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) has been among the organisations to raise concerns about this patchwork approach. Vehicles on pavements force blind and partially sighted people into the road, creating serious safety risks — and a system where pavement parking is restricted on some streets but not others can create confusion and inconsistency for people who depend on predictable, unobstructed routes.

The government has indicated it will issue statutory guidance to local authorities on how to implement the new powers, which should provide some consistency of approach. However, the practical reality is that in the short to medium term, pavement parking enforcement will look different in different parts of England.

What does this mean for developers and planners?

The pavement parking changes have a more direct connection to the planning system than might initially be obvious. Here are the areas where the new rules are likely to matter for anyone bringing forward a development.

Parking design and layout. New residential and commercial developments are required to demonstrate through the planning process that parking provision is adequate and well designed. A development that provides technically sufficient numbers of spaces but lays them out in a way that encourages or effectively requires vehicles to encroach onto the public pavement will face increasing scrutiny from planning officers — particularly as councils begin to actively enforce pavement parking restrictions in the surrounding area.

Dropped kerbs and vehicle crossings. Parking across dropped kerbs is already illegal, and the new legislation is expected to strengthen enforcement against it. For developers designing driveways, access points, and parking courts in new development, this reinforces the importance of ensuring that vehicle access is designed correctly and that dropped kerb positions do not create conflicts with on-street parking.

Narrow streets and constrained sites. In areas with narrow streets where pavement parking has historically filled a gap left by inadequate off-street parking provision, the new enforcement powers could create localised pressure on parking supply. This is relevant to any development in a constrained urban area where on-street parking management forms part of the transport assessment or parking strategy submitted with a planning application.

Section 106 car-free restrictions. As we covered in an earlier post on Section 106 agreements, local authorities increasingly use planning obligations to prevent future occupiers of well-connected developments from applying for on-street parking permits. The new pavement parking enforcement powers strengthen the argument for car-free or low-parking development in accessible locations, by making it clearer that alternative parking strategies — including pavement parking — will not be a viable workaround for inadequate off-street provision.

Active travel and pedestrian infrastructure. The NPPF and the government's Better Connected strategy both emphasise the importance of safe, unobstructed routes for pedestrians and cyclists as a prerequisite for genuinely sustainable travel. Pavement parking is one of the most significant practical barriers to active travel — particularly for wheelchair users, visually impaired pedestrians, and parents with young children. Stronger enforcement therefore directly supports the policy goals that planning authorities are now being asked to demonstrate in transport assessments and travel plans.

What about exemptions?

The legislation is expected to include provision for councils to grant exemptions for specific streets where pavement parking is genuinely unavoidable. The most obvious cases are very narrow residential streets where cars parked fully on the carriageway would prevent emergency vehicles or refuse lorries from passing.

However, the exemption process will require councils to actively consider and document which streets meet the criteria for an exemption — it will not simply be left to individual drivers to make their own judgment about whether a street is narrow enough to justify mounting the pavement. This is a significant change from the current position, where in practice many drivers have made exactly that judgment without any legal framework to constrain it.

The statutory guidance expected from the government should provide more detail on how councils are expected to approach the exemption process. Until that guidance is published, the full picture of how the new rules will operate in practice remains somewhat unclear. 

When will this actually happen?

The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026. The primary legislation is therefore already on the statute book.

What is still needed before enforcement can begin is the secondary legislation — the statutory instruments that will set out the detailed mechanics of how the new powers work in practice, including the fine levels, the exemption process, and the procedural requirements for councils implementing restrictions.

The government has stated it wants to move quickly. Late 2026 is the widely referenced target for the secondary legislation to be in place. However, even once the secondary legislation is made, individual councils will need time to identify and designate the streets where restrictions apply, put signage in place, and prepare their enforcement teams.

The realistic expectation is therefore that enforcement will begin in some areas by late 2026 or early 2027, with wider rollout across England happening progressively through 2027 and beyond. London-style consistency of enforcement across the country is likely to take several years to achieve.

A quick summary

The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act, which received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026, grants local councils across England new powers to restrict and enforce against pavement parking.

This is not a nationwide ban in the same way as Scotland. Councils will designate the streets where restrictions apply, without needing to go through a full Traffic Regulation Order process for each one.

Expected fines are £60 to £130 — mirroring the penalty charge notice system already operating in London — with a discount for prompt payment.

Further secondary legislation is still needed before enforcement can begin. Late 2026 is the target date, with a progressive rollout expected through 2027 and beyond.

For developers, the changes reinforce the importance of well-designed parking layouts that do not create pressure for vehicles to encroach onto public pavements, and strengthen the policy case for car-free or low-parking development in well-connected locations.

For pedestrians, wheelchair users, visually impaired people, and parents with pushchairs, the changes represent the most significant improvement to pavement accessibility outside London and Scotland in decades.

CLOSING PARAGRAPH:

England's pavement parking problem has been a long time coming to a head — debated for over a decade, consulted on extensively, and consistently supported by an overwhelming majority of the public. The legislation is now in place. What follows will depend on how quickly the government brings forward the secondary legislation and how effectively local authorities use their new powers. The direction of travel, however, is clear: pavement parking in England is finally being taken seriously as an enforcement priority, and the streets — quite literally — are going to be cleaner for it.

Next
Next

Parking Standards in Planning